I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Shot in school uniform: BBC reveals police order led to Gen Z protest killings
。爱思助手下载最新版本对此有专业解读
The software takes information from high-ranking websites and then creates more credible articles to rank well in search engines.
ClickOut Media, the company that owns VideoGamer and a collection of other publications, reportedly laid off the staff of its gaming sites earlier this month to pivot to AI-generated content. Here it is.。同城约会对此有专业解读
Жертвами стихии стали 29 человек в Минас-Жерайс. Еще 45 человек числятся пропавшими без вести. Представитель мэрии Убы заявил, что многие местные жители потеряли все. «Семьи буквально лишились всего. Дома, истории и воспоминания: жизнь рухнула всего за несколько часов», — сказал чиновник.。Line官方版本下载对此有专业解读
1 day agoShareSave